Revive Old Posts automates social sharing of your archive content. Manual scheduling tools (Buffer, Hootsuite, Sprout Social) give you full control over what gets shared and when. Neither is universally better – the right answer depends on your content volume, audience, and social media goals.
What Automation Does Well
Revive Old Posts excels at consistent volume. If you have published 500 blog posts over the past three years, manually curating a resharing queue for all of them is impractical. Automation handles the long tail of archive content that would otherwise sit unused after its initial publication spike. The plugin runs continuously in the background, maintaining a steady stream of content without requiring ongoing attention.
For sites where the goal is keeping social accounts active and driving steady organic traffic from older content, automation delivers results proportional to the size and quality of the archive. A site with 200 good posts generates more value from automated resharing than a site with 20 posts, because the variety prevents repetition and the archive is large enough to stay relevant.
What Manual Scheduling Does Better
Manual scheduling with a tool like Buffer lets you choose exactly which posts to share and when, write custom captions optimised for each platform and moment, attach different images for different platforms, and respond to current events by timing relevant archive content appropriately. If your audience expects a curated, thoughtful social presence rather than automated content, manual scheduling maintains that quality signal.
Manual scheduling also allows for strategic timing: sharing a post about summer travel when summer approaches, or sharing a roundup post when a related news event makes it timely. Revive Old Posts shares based on age and recency rules, not topical relevance to current events.
Not sure which fits your site? Describe your needs and get a free recommendation.
A Combined Approach
Many content-heavy sites use both. Revive Old Posts handles the bulk of archive sharing automatically, while manual scheduling covers new content, trending topics, and strategic reshares that require human judgement. This gives you continuous social presence from the archive without requiring daily manual work, while preserving the ability to make intentional sharing decisions for content that deserves specific attention.
Configure Revive Old Posts with conservative settings (fewer posts per day, longer intervals) when using it alongside manual scheduling. You want automation to fill gaps, not dominate your feed and push your manual posts out of visibility.
When to Use Neither
If your business does not generate blog content regularly, and your social accounts are primarily for customer engagement rather than content distribution, both Revive Old Posts and social scheduling tools add complexity without meaningful return. A local business that primarily responds to customer messages on Facebook does not benefit from automated blog resharing in the same way a content publisher does.